Re: Minimum Watts required
http://www.audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cls.pl? ... ad-Invaria
It is currently Sun May 26, 2013 5:35 am
treitz3 wrote:Watts are overrated. A high current amplifier that is capable of handling a low ohm load will properly power those speakers. FYI, there are not many amps out there that will do them true justice at all volume levels. Out of the Carver lineup amps I have heard with these speakers, only the 9t [7t would be about the same, just never heard one paired up with these speakers] and the Lightstar amps made these speakers sing.
As far as Sunfire, the 300 x 2 would be a good choice as well. I haven't heard that amp, but I did have a chance to hear a 300 x 7 at CF and it had plenty of juice to make them sing.
Another amp that you may consider would be one of the tube amps that Bob is currently building. Out of all of the aforementioned amps, the tube amps would be my choice. Why? I love the sound of tubes, YMMV. Hope this helps.

OconeeOrange wrote:"Gary likes to play it 'loud' as do I. His system begs you turn it up until you die"
SILVER-7t
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:59 am
Location: Great NorthWest.....Carver Country..
TNRabbit wrote:treitz3 wrote:Watts are overrated. A high current amplifier that is capable of handling a low ohm load will properly power those speakers. FYI, there are not many amps out there that will do them true justice at all volume levels. Out of the Carver lineup amps I have heard with these speakers, only the 9t [7t would be about the same, just never heard one paired up with these speakers] and the Lightstar amps made these speakers sing.
As far as Sunfire, the 300 x 2 would be a good choice as well. I haven't heard that amp, but I did have a chance to hear a 300 x 7 at CF and it had plenty of juice to make them sing.
Another amp that you may consider would be one of the tube amps that Bob is currently building. Out of all of the aforementioned amps, the tube amps would be my choice. Why? I love the sound of tubes, YMMV. Hope this helps.
Tom, what you heard was the 400x7.![]()
And the 600x2 will drive a low ohm load, just not at it's RATED power. Bob said you can only get so much from an outlet, so they had to limit the amount of current available at a particular ohm load. For example, the 600x2 WILL output 600 watts into 8 ohms, and 1200 into 4 ohms, but the laws of physics dictate it won't be able to keep that doubling of output power due to an 1800 watt max draw (fused) from a 15 amp circuit. So the 600x2 WILL power a low-ohm load just like the 300x2, but it won't continue doubling into the halved load because it's physically impossible from a standard circuit. That's what Bob meant when he said it wasn'thappy driving loads below 4 ohms.
I wonder if it's possible the signature model would go further on a 30 amp circuit if the fuse size was increased....??? Maybe someone could ask Bob about that....![]()
TNRabbit wrote:Tom, what you heard was the 400x7.![]()
And the 600x2 will drive a low ohm load, just not at it's RATED power. Bob said you can only get so much from an outlet, so they had to limit the amount of current available at a particular ohm load. For example, the 600x2 WILL output 600 watts into 8 ohms, and 1200 into 4 ohms, but the laws of physics dictate it won't be able to keep that doubling of output power due to an 1800 watt max draw (fused) from a 15 amp circuit. So the 600x2 WILL power a low-ohm load just like the 300x2, but it won't continue doubling into the halved load because it's physically impossible from a standard circuit. That's what Bob meant when he said it wasn'thappy driving loads below 4 ohms.
I wonder if it's possible the signature model would go further on a 30 amp circuit if the fuse size was increased....??? Maybe someone could ask Bob about that....![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests