radioeng2 wrote:On the null test. Since high bit rate sounds so much better than 44.1/16, that tells you that redbook leaves out a lot. So I'd wonder if a null test could ever reveal small differences like this. I also wonder how precisely you can line up to match the audio before doing the null? I don't use the editors all day at work like some of the guys, so I don't know how easy it would be to get perfect alignment. Analog null doesn't have this issue and the resolution is much higher for sure than 44.1/16!
PS...I thought at one point that the CF test was to compare FLAC files versus CDP redbook. But maybe I was wrong....
Every recording/playback method has it's drawbacks. Better equipment helps as does a better/cleaner source and more data. Think a R2R machine playing at 15ips vs. a cassette or 8-track tape. Or fer you youngins CD vs SACD.
Dr. Shockley postulated that an LP contained approximately 50GBs of data. At that time however, there weren't any techniques available to record and store the data in a cost effective form. Now we have BR that can store that much and at really high sampling rates. My computer's audio card has many more times the resolution of a CD, so you'd think that would be audible.
On the other hand, I've got some CDs that sound GREAT.
I reckon we'll see in roughly 80 days.
Its going to be used equipment when I sell it, so it may as well be used equipment when I buy it.
Tim deParavicini's E.A.R. Yoshino V20 Integrated Amplifier, Fosgate Signature Phono pre, Lucas Labs 12B4/OD3 LineStage, No. 50 and 51 Carverfest Tube amps, Hammond M3 tube amp, Rega Planar3 w/SME 3009iii tonearm, Grado Statement Master1 cartridge, Carver TX-8 & 11 tuners, Carver TD-12, Tascam CC-222mkII CD recorder, DBX-3BX & 200xg & 120x, CarverAudio ALV prototypes, Alesis Studio One loudspeakers, CarverFest 2015 speakers, Cambridge Audio Model 8s, The Carver Research DarkStar Sub and Stax Earspeakers.
THIS SPACE FOR RENT...helping the blind to hear, one valve at a time