FAQ  •  Register   •  Gallery •  Login

It is currently Thu Oct 02, 2014 9:37 am

Ripped Audio vs. CD audio... Throwing Down the Gauntlet !!!

<<

Toy Maker

User avatar

Puppet Master

Posts: 6454

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:26 am

Post Thu Jun 23, 2011 8:07 pm

Re: Ripped Audio vs. CD audio... Throwing Down the Gauntlet

This is why I chose to go with the Transporter over building a dedicated audio PC.
The Transporter needs nothing but an el'crapo PC running somewhere on the network to transfer the tiles over the network. From there the Transporter does the rest. There just needs to be an OS running somewhere to let the Transporter access the files.

To be honest... I find it pretty stupid that SlimDevices did not incorporate a Linux based flash drive into the Transporter, to allow you to just plug in a hard drive via USB to the back of the unit. Then you wouldn't even need the PC.

Maybe I'll mod my Transporter... I need to open it up to replace the chrome rack handles with black ones soon anyway.
Whatever you do in life will be insignificant, but it's very important that you do it... because nobody else will.

‎~You think Einstein walked around thinkin' everyone was a bunch of dumb shits?~

SHUT UP AND ENJOY THE MUSIC!
╭∩╮(︶︿︶)╭∩╮
<<

OconeeOrange

SILVER-7 TUBE AMP

Posts: 4487

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:24 pm

Post Thu Jun 23, 2011 8:55 pm

Re: Ripped Audio vs. CD audio... Throwing Down the Gauntlet

Toy Maker wrote:.

To be honest... I find it pretty stupid that SlimDevices did not incorporate a Linux based flash drive into the Transporter, to allow you to just plug in a hard drive via USB to the back of the unit. Then you wouldn't even need the PC..


The best thing about Linux is that it is free. Users like to tell you they use it too feel superior.

I keep up with it as a hobby. Compared to PC and MAC, it is a joke.
<<

BillD

User avatar

(pair of) SILVER-7 TUBE AMPs

Posts: 7295

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 8:29 pm

Location: The west's most mid-western town, Scottsdale, Arizona

Post Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:03 pm

Re: Ripped Audio vs. CD audio... Throwing Down the Gauntlet

I worked on a mainframe that ran Multics, which was the inspiration for UNIX which was the inspiration for Linux. Everything was command line interface. Tedious, but it got the job done.
It should sound like it isn't there!
There is a difference between hearing and listening...
Making life enjoyable through expensive electronics.
_________________
Carver: C-4000 & C-1 preamps, PSC-60 preamp/tuner, TX-11a tuner, M-400 (2), C-500, M-500, M-500t, M-500t Mk.II, A-500x, AL-III loudspeakers (2 pr.)
Sunfire:Theater Grand III processor, Ultimate Receiver, Cinema Grand Signature 400 ~ seven, True Subwoofer Mk. II, D-10 Subwoofer
<<

OconeeOrange

SILVER-7 TUBE AMP

Posts: 4487

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:24 pm

Post Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:06 pm

Re: Ripped Audio vs. CD audio... Throwing Down the Gauntlet

BillD wrote:I worked on a mainframe that ran Multics, which was the inspiration for UNIX which was the inspiration for Linux. Everything was command line interface. Tedious, but it got the job done.


It works well, but not for the masses as most can't use mainstream stuff.
<<

Toy Maker

User avatar

Puppet Master

Posts: 6454

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:26 am

Post Sat Jun 25, 2011 7:04 am

Re: Ripped Audio vs. CD audio... Throwing Down the Gauntlet

Got everything hooked up as it will be at the Fest, and will be running a few tests today. I will post my results later tonight.

Been streaming Pandora for the last 3 days, and have hardly had the TV on at all, "very odd for me" as I watch TV 24/7 most of the time.
God there is allot of music I have forgotten about out there... I love the fact that Pandora grabs all kinds of other shit from the same genre and plays it.
Whatever you do in life will be insignificant, but it's very important that you do it... because nobody else will.

‎~You think Einstein walked around thinkin' everyone was a bunch of dumb shits?~

SHUT UP AND ENJOY THE MUSIC!
╭∩╮(︶︿︶)╭∩╮
<<

OconeeOrange

SILVER-7 TUBE AMP

Posts: 4487

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:24 pm

Post Sat Jun 25, 2011 6:01 pm

Re: Ripped Audio vs. CD audio... Throwing Down the Gauntlet

Toy Maker wrote: I love the fact that Pandora grabs all kinds of other shit from the same genre and plays it.


\:D/ \:D/
<<

Toy Maker

User avatar

Puppet Master

Posts: 6454

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:26 am

Post Sat Jun 25, 2011 9:52 pm

Re: Ripped Audio vs. CD audio... Throwing Down the Gauntlet

Going to go make a couple new digital RCAs and A/B some wav file and their CDs.
Be back in a few hours to post again.
Whatever you do in life will be insignificant, but it's very important that you do it... because nobody else will.

‎~You think Einstein walked around thinkin' everyone was a bunch of dumb shits?~

SHUT UP AND ENJOY THE MUSIC!
╭∩╮(︶︿︶)╭∩╮
<<

Toy Maker

User avatar

Puppet Master

Posts: 6454

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:26 am

Post Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:25 am

Re: Ripped Audio vs. CD audio... Throwing Down the Gauntlet

1st I will list all equipment used.

Proceed AVP Preamp
Logitech Transporter
Denon 2910 DVD Player
Lightstar Reference Amplifier
AL-III plus Speakers
JL Fathom Subwoofer F-112
All CarverAudio cables

Exact Audio Copy (EAC) bit for bit ripping software
Acer 8930 laptop to rip the CDs
Acer Home Server to store the files.
Linksys WiFi router to connect everything.


I ripped a few of my favorite CDs that I still had stashed away.
Most of the files that EAC made came out 100% bit for bit perfect.
There were however a few files that were 99.9 or 99.7 due to the CDs being old and scratched pretty badly.
After moving all the newly ripped files from my laptop over to the music server, I started listening.
I went right to tracks I knew really well, played a few of them, and just listened. After about a half hour, I put in the CD, and started to listen to it. I was listening for small nuances that I knew were in the songs and could pinpoint with the ripped file with no problem. I was checking to see if there were being played in the same place in the room.

Then we started switching back and forth while playing the same tracks on both units.
Knowing which source I was listening to, I thought I was hearing slight differences, and was sure I could tell the 2 apart.
Then I did it blind. I started both players, and had Alex switch them back and forth. Blindfolded, I had bo clue which was which... I was basically guessing.

So, the test seems to be EXTREMELY even if you ask me. I will be seriously impressed if anyone can tell me which is which. Not right off the bat, but I'd go as far as letting someone listed to the same tracks NOT blindfolded at first, and then blindfold them, and see if they can tell which source is playing.

After listening myself, I have absolutely no problem what so ever abandoning CDs forever.
Keep in mind, you HAVE to have an original CD in the beginning to rip your files from, or get already ripped files from some other source.

Can't wait to play at CarverFest !!!!!!
Whatever you do in life will be insignificant, but it's very important that you do it... because nobody else will.

‎~You think Einstein walked around thinkin' everyone was a bunch of dumb shits?~

SHUT UP AND ENJOY THE MUSIC!
╭∩╮(︶︿︶)╭∩╮
<<

treitz3

User avatar

"Julian"
"Julian"

Posts: 7746

Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:39 pm

Location: The tube lair in Charlotte, NC

Post Tue Jun 28, 2011 9:13 pm

Wait a minute!!

I do reserve the right to change systems. Not the test equipment but the systems [speakers/amplifier/location] if I do not detect any difference one the first test on speakers I am not familiar with. You left that out, James. Not that I feel I will need it but we have been over this before behind the scenes numerous times.

Just wanted to point that out. :wink:
In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence.

The best way to enjoy digital music reproduction is to never listen to a good analogue reproduction.

Robert R. - "Did you see my North Korea analogy? I should have named it Carversite.kim"
<<

OconeeOrange

SILVER-7 TUBE AMP

Posts: 4487

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:24 pm

Post Tue Jun 28, 2011 9:32 pm

Re: Wait a minute!!

treitz3 wrote:I do reserve the right to change systems. Not the test equipment but the systems [speakers/amplifier/location] if I do not detect any difference one the first test on speakers I am not familiar with. You left that out, James. Not that I feel I will need it but we have been over this before behind the scenes numerous times.

Just wanted to point that out. :wink:


Good deal TOM.

Most of this post is about equipment worth thousands.

No one here could accuse us of being friends, but that could change.

You are still willing to show up with just your ears. I have made fun of that, but now I cannot as only displays of courage makes me cry in a movie.

I now find my self wanting the man to win over the machine.

Too that end, you should insist that all tunes be played over a player you are familiar with. It is the only fair way.

Check back a few posts on how to do that in a fair way none could object too.

I am pulling for you. On the surface you come across as an asshole, but now as you back it up -- I was wrong about you.

So, we should make the test fair.
<<

treitz3

User avatar

"Julian"
"Julian"

Posts: 7746

Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:39 pm

Location: The tube lair in Charlotte, NC

Post Tue Jun 28, 2011 9:54 pm

Big -vs- little change...

The players I am familiar with will not work for this test. Even though I am using my own and possibly others. I prefer tubes. Tubes will not be used. Digital out is what will be used. The transport is all I am going to notice a difference in. [supposedly only that and jitter possibly...along with the oversampling rate]

The speakers, location and amplifier changes are just there for reserve. That's all. :wink:
In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence.

The best way to enjoy digital music reproduction is to never listen to a good analogue reproduction.

Robert R. - "Did you see my North Korea analogy? I should have named it Carversite.kim"
<<

vigotone

Newbie 50+

Posts: 58

Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:55 pm

Location: Los Angeles, CA

Post Tue Jun 28, 2011 11:33 pm

Re: Ripped Audio vs. CD audio... Throwing Down the Gauntlet

I know I'm late to the party, but I prefer a CD ripped to my Mac Mini and played back via USB -> Lindemann Asynchronous USB DAC -> AVR (via high quality IC's) than from the same CD in my Oppo BDP-83 connected to the AVR via HDMI. I'm sure it's because of the dedicated DAC, which is far superior to the DAC in my Denon AVR.
<<

OconeeOrange

SILVER-7 TUBE AMP

Posts: 4487

Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:24 pm

Post Tue Jun 28, 2011 11:56 pm

Re: Big -vs- little change...

treitz3 wrote:The players I am familiar with will not work for this test. Even though I am using my own and possibly others. I prefer tubes. Tubes will not be used. Digital out is what will be used. The transport is all I am going to notice a difference in. [supposedly only that and jitter possibly...along with the oversampling rate]

The speakers, location and amplifier changes are just there for reserve. That's all. :wink:


Good deal--

You are out to prove your ears can detect components.
I hope you can.

As to ripped as opposed to CD - nothing will be proved in the test.
<<

Toy Maker

User avatar

Puppet Master

Posts: 6454

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 1:26 am

Post Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:04 am

Re: Ripped Audio vs. CD audio... Throwing Down the Gauntlet

Not a problem Tom.

I know we said on the phone, we should move the test euipment to a couple different cabins, and try it.

Also... The people over on "the other" forum are telling me to go as far as to NOT use wav files, and use FLAC files, that you won't be able to tell the difference with them either. So I may go ahead and rip your CD twice in 2 different formats. We can do that after you do the wav files. If you can't tell which is which with the wavs, we'll switch over to the FLAC copies and try again.

And again OO, I don't care who's transport we use, as long as it has a digital RCA output.
Whatever you do in life will be insignificant, but it's very important that you do it... because nobody else will.

‎~You think Einstein walked around thinkin' everyone was a bunch of dumb shits?~

SHUT UP AND ENJOY THE MUSIC!
╭∩╮(︶︿︶)╭∩╮
<<

AlexSauter

User avatar

Site Admin

Posts: 608

Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:41 pm

Location: Fort Myers FL

Post Wed Jun 29, 2011 1:15 am

Re: Ripped Audio vs. CD audio... Throwing Down the Gauntlet

I know I look like this when Tom gets into his technical end of stereo and stuff...

Image

...but, I can understand the concept that no matter what digital CD player we use, we should not hear a difference (or at least not one large enough to matter!!)

Sure, if we switch the amp or the speakers or the location, or use an Anolog source there will be a change in the "voice" of the music, but that's not what we are testing!!!










Just my .002
RIP BillD
BillD wrote:Well, some people are glass half empty people and some are glass half full. Being an engineer, I just think the glass is the wrong size.


My system (sitting in the garage):

(Stereo System)
Modified Carver AL III+'s (Pushed into the corners to make room for the ALS speakers)
Modified CarverFest 2011 20w tube amplifier
Carver Pro PT-1800
Sunfire Prototype TGA-2375
Carver TX-2 Tuner (not used)
Logitech Squeezebox (replaced Tuner & dad's CD player)
CARVERaudio Directional RCA interconnects
RCA-Headphone jack for iPod & iPhone
PreviousNext

Return to CARVERFEST 2011

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

Powered by phpBB © 2011 phpBB Group.