CarverFest 20w Tube Amp Schematics & Pictograms

dont forget the +/- on the caps.....

dont forget the +/- on the caps.....

So how do you tell the difference? are you talking about the smal, black ones, or the turd-colored ones?

There is a line on both axial and radial caps. On radials, it is on the side of the negative lead (which is shorter than the positive lead). On axials, it has arrows on it that point to the negative lead. There are also other ways.

FYI: no, the question pertains to the drawing. is what he meant. Thanks Bill

good work there alex. hey, next time you chat with bob, ask him for me if the tube amp will run the 60" ribbons full range without issue. the ribbons are a 4.3 ohm load but it could be purely resistive if that makes a differance on the amp. bob said this of his little ribbons, so i would think the big ones would be no different. on the 300x2, i like the sound of the one ohm resistors in the amp. shiit, it ran the new ones without issue, i just wanna double check though as i an not the bobfather when it comes to these matters. thanks,

Angelo,

In tube amps, loading like this won't do any harm, just a little more distortion quicker. It does not risk fire, flame, letting the magic smoke out and fried tweeters like in SS.

Convential tube amps have output transformers. The loading on one side is reflected to the other side. It's always a ratio from in to out. They're designed for an anticipated load, it's not an impedance that they present. So when you change the load on the speaker side, it reflects this change to the tube load. As you know, speakers load changes by frequency anyway. All over! So as you suspect, a ribbon's uniform load has some advantages in that it will remain at the spec and not swing all over.

By presenting a stiffer load you'll be moving the tube a bit away from it's swe-etest spot, which Bob would have presumably design the amp to run in. Stiffer load means higher power demanded and higher distortion, lighter load means lower power, less distortion.

The more traditional output xfrm loading is to use about a 7.6K load or so for a PP EL84. Bob opted for what he thought sounded nicer and went with 10K OPT. So I'd suspect you'll move a bit off the swe-etest spot, but probably not be loaded so, so different from what's more typical on the EL84.

So have no fear, just be aware that as you push up in level, the waveform will start to flatten out as the amp runs out of ability to go there. It doesn't tax the amp though in a way that causes harm...just can reach the point where it gets less pleasing.

That's the word, until you get the official word...

Mark

Everyone that needs the Zener mod, here it's!! You have to put them in PARALLEL rather than in series.





I don't know if everyone can see this link, I will try to do better tomorrow, this is as good as I can do on my iPad...
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid= ... e=1&ref=nf

ok, so the diodes i bought a hundred of, everyone needs two per amp now, correct?

ok, so the diodes i bought a hundred of, everyone needs two per amp now, correct?

Yessir!!

Angelo, it looks like I will be needing two pair [I have two amps].

just to clarify, what is the voltage of the diodes?
started out at 7.5v then to 15v.

can ya post the email or pm, for the said change, did Bob say why, for this change??????

Everyone that needs the Zener mod, here it's!! You have to put them in PARALLEL rather than in series.





I don't know if everyone can see this link, I will try to do better tomorrow, this is as good as I can do on my iPad...
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?

Alex, you're a sick fuck..posting your tiny zener for all to see......












fbid=286841358020412&set=a.145256475512235.15449.100000836504830&type=1&ref=nf

so which one is the zener? Im not a electronics whiz!!